Author Topic: GANtt on develop?  (Read 11955 times)

iker

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 3
    • View Profile
    • Email
GANtt on develop?
« on: February 19, 2009, 08:28:18 am »
Is planed to add a GANTT view of the task? is someone developing it? is it posible to develop a demo and then send to development team or is a waste of time?

regards

conrado

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 998
  • Conrado
    • View Profile
    • Feng Office
    • Email
Re: GANtt on develop?
« Reply #1 on: February 20, 2009, 07:00:47 pm »
I am not aware of anyone developing it.

It is something we would like to add, but not in our current priorities.

We love to receive contributions and work hard with contributors to have their work integrated.
Get Official Support for your Feng Office. Support the development team. Sign up for a Free Trial here.

cguyer

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 33
    • MSN Messenger - colby_guyer@hotmail.com
    • AOL Instant Messenger - excag03
    • Yahoo Instant Messenger - excag18
    • View Profile
    • TIU11
    • Email
Re: GANtt on develop?
« Reply #2 on: May 14, 2009, 02:04:30 pm »
my company is looking to help speed up the gantt chart development, im sure we will be in contact and see if we can strike a deal.

adrinoe

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 2
    • View Profile
Re: GANtt on develop?
« Reply #3 on: October 05, 2009, 06:16:30 am »
I am interested in this application, someone would have news?

Guite

  • Guest
Re: GANtt on develop?
« Reply #4 on: January 12, 2010, 09:13:59 am »
I am interested as well. Maybe you already know jsGantt - it could be a base for that: http://jsgantt.com/

smazian

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 13
    • View Profile
Re: GANtt on develop?
« Reply #5 on: January 18, 2010, 01:06:06 pm »
Yes, me too.
I'd like to know if cguyer has done some work in that way.
That could help. :)

Syrion

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 59
    • View Profile
    • Studio Krater v.o.f.
Re: GANtt on develop?
« Reply #6 on: March 22, 2010, 07:36:21 pm »
Just in case, a solution is offered in this thread.