Author Topic: Community Vs Professional Business Model?  (Read 3294 times)

krashnik

  • Freshman
  • *
  • Posts: 25
    • View Profile
    • HardMagic Publishing
Community Vs Professional Business Model?
« on: September 14, 2012, 01:48:20 pm »
First off, Great job on the 2.2 Beta release and all else going on.  I know this is a hard feat and look forward to what you create in the future.

I am still using v1.75 until I feel there is a 100% secure upgrade path.  I have also created quite a few modifications that I'll have to completely remake since table structures have been changed.

I am wondering the reason of having two different versions of FengOffice 2.x?  I see there are many features not included in the CE version compared with Pro.  Normally in an Open Source environment, this is offered the opposite way.

You use the Community version for new & innovative plugins, mods, and features.  Once those become stable, you release them in your professional version. 

With this business model, you make money from offering hosting & support to developers & businesses.  This seems to be the business model used prior to version 2.0.

I now see a strong difference in the direction FO is going with version 2.x.  As a member of the Community who has a plethora of code, expertise, and funds to contribute to this project, I'd like the community members to be made aware of the future of the development.

Do you plan on taking CE & Pro Editions in different directions to entice people to make a purchase of your product, or will CE always offer an open source version of the latest build of FO?

I understand developers haven't contributed nearly as much as your team would have liked in the past, but you must also understand that your product is very young and the direction of the entire Feng project has not been made clear to the public.  Nor has a proper plugin procedure been developed until recently.  With a clear business plan and collaborative communication with members I think you will find that developers will offer stronger support.

Also, focusing on making a seamless transition between 1.75 > 2.2 should be the highest priority over coming up with new features. 

I finally got my business to the point that I can contribute some great code to this project, but with so many structural changes in 1.75 to 2.0 - I will be spending easily 6 months of my team's time upgrading all of our features before I feel comfortable contributing large plugins.  A few plugins we have developed include an entire Mobile App for Feng - just to give you an example of the type of funds I have put into this platform.

With the ability to add new plugins to version 2.2, I know developers like myself will be happy to aide in the development of this opensource software.  However, we only have the intention of helping if it is truly going to be 100% open source in the future with a community edition that is not handicapped.

Please explain how you see the direction of Feng being developed and the effort you expect Community members utilizing the CE version to partake.
Owner of HardMagic Publishing

noadver

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 3
    • View Profile
Re: Community Vs Professional Business Model?
« Reply #1 on: November 02, 2012, 07:41:44 pm »
I have been testing all the following opensource projects based on the premises of the business model, fearing that I contribute to the project and then they cripple it out, like for example Teambox did, and I cannot even consider Teambox opensource anymore.

zimbra
openatrium
projectfork.net
projectpier.org
protaskm.com
Roundcube (with calendar and task plugins)
Horde
Citadel
BetterMeans
group-office.eu
collabtive.o-dyn.de
cynapse.com
projectorria.org
soplanning.org
kunagi.org
libreplan.org
plandora.org
project-open.net
qdpm.net
project.net
egroupware.org
todoyu.net
chandlerproject.org
phprojekt.co
phpGroupware

Finally, FengOffice won as the more simple and complete solution, and I have been investigating how's your open source model works, the difference beetwen Community versus Pro really good explained in the webpage itself, and without any workaround discurse. I would love for example if RedHat went out to say "we use Fedora as the testbed for RHEL" but anywayz their money strategy is well stated, but it's always better for a project to live forever surrounded by community developers to take the approach of Debian for example. I wish you get millions of dollars from your product, and for you to choose the BEST strategy to accomplish that, but please state clearly how you are going to accomplish that, because we have  implications for our invest of work, money, etc, in this. Not to say that you did not alredy stated this, may I just have not found it.

Long live Mujica!

noadver

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 3
    • View Profile
Re: Community Vs Professional Business Model?
« Reply #2 on: November 03, 2012, 12:55:34 am »
I'm really sorry for adopting a cynic attitude when posting, you deserve gratittude, I happen to live in Argentina, which happens to have a cynic idiosyncrasy.

Cynicism: is an attitude or state of mind characterized by a general distrust of others' apparent motives or ambitions, or a general lack of faith or hope in the human race or in individuals with desires, hopes, opinions, or personal tastes that a cynic perceives as unrealistic or inappropriate, therefore deserving of ridicule or admonishment.

Your work is great, needed, and I hope I'll be contributing soon.

An unrelated song to listen: /watch?v=w8LYl7fO3AQ&feature=share&list=AL94UKMTqg-9DTQN78UnaKNtS63kQuIYLP